Research Summary: Economics of Dryland Camelina Biofuels Production

Farm Energy April 30, 2014 Print Friendly and PDF
 


This research funded by SARE. Learn More.

Is it economical to produce camelina for biodiesel? How do the economics work when its product is integrated as biofuel and livestock feed? 

Table of Contents

Abstract

The recent focus on camelina production in the western United States has been generated by an interest in establishing this oilseed as a rotational crop in a dryland system. Part of the interest lies in the ability to make biodiesel from the oil and use the meal as livestock feed.

Research Purpose

Camelina seed pods
The bulletin Is Biodiesel from Camelina Right for You? evaluates the economics of an on-farm biodiesel production system from dryland camelina. A spreadsheet “calculator” estimates oil and meal costs, from which estimates of profitability are obtained.

Research Activities

We estimated the costs for a camelina–biodiesel system based on the process outlined in Biodiesel Basics and Beyond by Kemp (2006). Kemp uses a series of electric water heaters to turn vegetable oil into fuel. Note that this process has not been evaluated for safety by the University of Wyoming and as such, this research does not constitute an endorsement of this process. We also developed a spreadsheet-based “calculator” that has been refined for a detailed comparison between different parts of the process.

What Has Been Learned?

The results show that this 385-acre system produces an estimated 7,344 gallons of biodiesel. Total meal production is estimated to be 71.9 tons based on 347 harvested acres and 600 pounds-per-acre yield. The cost of biodiesel production was estimated to be $3.84 per gallon for ownership and operating costs.

The amount of meal produced shows that producers should primarily consider meal disposition rather than oil production in this enterprise, and be sure to have sufficient livestock resources available to consume the meal. An interesting observation is that the key driver in the system is the price of the feedstock. Lower costs of the camelina feedstocks, as compared to other oilseed crops, increase the attractiveness of camelina for biodiesel production. However, lower prices for camelina versus wheat prices make growing this crop less attractive to the producer. From a purely financial perspective, on-farm biodiesel production from dryland camelina is not economically feasible.

Why Is This Important?

This research illustrates the premium that producers would need to achieve their goals of fuel security, protection from volatile fuel prices, and concern over the impact of petroleum diesel on the environment. However, we understand that economics is only one variable (albeit quite important) in the decision-making process. Farmers do have a choice. Biodiesel may have a place in a farmer’s production system, but it will not come without a price.

For More Information

Contact Thomas Foulke, Senior Research Scientist, University of Wyoming, Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics.  Foulke@uwyo.edu

Contributors to This Research Summary

Authors

Peer Reviewers

Since 1988, the SARE grants and education program has advanced agricultural innovation that promotes profitability; stewardship of the land, air, and water; and quality of life for farmers, ranchers, and their communities. 

Learn about SARE and the many aspects of the SARE program here: http://www.sare.org/About-SARE.

 

Connect with us

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+

Welcome

This is where you can find research-based information from America's land-grant universities enabled by eXtension.org

LOCATE

USDA / NIFA

This work is supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, New Technologies for Ag Extension project.