Wood Energy and Soil Productivity

Wood Energy March 24, 2010 Print Friendly and PDF

by Diomy Zamora and Charlie Blinn

Soil is the fundamental resource of the forest (MFRC 2007). Without it or its productive capacity, the other resources of the forest are diminished. For example, soil productivity influences what plants can grow on a site and how well they grow; maintaining soil productivity will facilitate the regeneration, survival, and long-term growth of desired vegetation; and productive soils sustain a variety of forest values such as timber harvesting, wildlife habitat and biodiversity.


Growing and harvesting biomass has the potential to impact the following aspects of soils (MFCR 2007).

  • Physical properties, including soil structure, texture, porosity, density, drainage, and surface hydrology,
  • Chemical status, including nutrient status and pH, and
  • Biological characteristics of soils (i.e., the organisms that live in the soil).

Management activities may impact soil physical and chemical properties which will eventually affect soil nutrients, organic matter and moisture-holding capacity (Hall and Richardson 2001). Increased trafficking increases the potential for soil displacement, compaction and rutting, erosion, nutrient depletion and erosion. Soil compaction increases soil strength which commonly slows root penetration and reduces the regeneration and growth of trees (Greacen and Sands, 1980; Miller et al., 1996), reduces soil infiltration rates, increases the potential for erosion, changes landscape hydrology (Harr et al. 1979). Water tables can rise after a biomass harvesting operation as tree removal reduces stand water uptake and evaporative loss.

Where woody biomass is removed under a two-pass system (i.e., the harvesting and recovery of roundwood and biomass occur in separate passes), increased trafficking occurs across the harvested site. This additional trafficking can result in more compaction across the site.

Mechanical site preparation techniques such as tillage, raking, windrowing, disking and piling can lead to reductions in soil organic matter which is important for maintaining soil microbial communities, forming soil structure, soil carbon storage, nutrient cycling and regulation of soil hydrological processes (Lattimore et al., 2009). A reduction in soil organic matter and soil carbon storage will reduce the total capital and availability of nutrients especially nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K) and calcium (Ca).

Soil biological processes are generally decreased through compaction, exposure of mineral soils, drying, accumulation of toxic elements, and extreme temperatures that may be caused by removal of downed and dead wood from the forest floor (Swift et al. 1979, Dick et al. 1988).

Where root suckering or coppice regeneration (i.e., a cycle where are cut to ground level every few years and then regrow from the stumps into a clump of stems) is planned, it is especially important to avoid damaging the root systems through compaction and rutting.

Mitigation Strategies

All states have published water quality best management practices and some have woody biomass harvesting guidelines which are intended to mitigate a variety of impacts. They can serve as an excellent source of strategies to consider. Selected strategies are presented below. When working with a third-party contractor, consider including relevant mitigation strategies in a written, signed contract.

  • Implement forestry best management practices which help manage water movement on-site. Use extra caution when considering tillage and road construction operations on erosion-prone sites.
  • Design planting and harvesting activities with local hydrological conditions in mind to minimize the need for intensive site restoration later.
  • Minimize the amount of infrastructure (roads, skid trails, and landings).
  • Schedule activities to occur when soils are dry or frozen (MFRC, 2007; Lattimore et al., 2009).
  • Avoiding re-entry into the general harvest area with a second operation for the sole purpose of harvesting biomass.
  • Identify nutrient-poor sites and avoid harvesting biomass on those sites.
  • Retain adequate quantities of slash on-site. There is no consensus over the exact amount of residue that should remain on a site after biomass extraction. Finnish guidelines recommend leaving up to 30% of residue or the same amount of nutrients on the forest floor (Heninger et al., 1997). Minnesota’s guidelines recommend intentionally retaining 20% of the slash (MFRC 2007). Other best management practices include retention of tree needles and foliage on-site for nutrients.
  • Retain a suitable amount of organic matter and organic soil cover as it reduces soil erosion and helps maintain favorable soil temperatures and moisture relations.

Follow the links below to find out more about the environmental impacts of woody biomass utilization.


  • Dick, R.P., D.D. Myrold, and E.A. Kerle. 1988. Microbial biomass and soil enzyme activities in compacted and rehabilitated skid trail soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52:512–516.
  • Greacen EL, Sands R. 1980. Compaction of forest soils: a review. Aust. J. Soil Res. 18:169–189.
  • Hall JP, Richardson J. 2001. ENFOR - Energy from the Forest. The Forestry Chronicle, Vol.77(5) 831-836.
  • Harr RD, Fredriksen RL, Rothacher J 1979. Changes in streamflow following timber harvest in southwestern Oregon. USDA For. Serv. Res. Paper PNW-249. Pacific Northwest For. and Range Exp. Stn., Portland, OR. 22 p. Available online at: http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/28763 (accessed March 10, 2010).
  • Heninger RL, Terry TA, Dobkowski A, Scott W. 1997. Managing for sustainable site productivity: Weyerhaeuser's forestry perspective. Biomass and Bioenergy Elservier ltd., Oxford, UK. 13(4-5) p. 255-267.
  • Lattimore B, Smith CT, Titus BD, Stupak I, Egnell G. 2009. Environmental factors in woodfuel production: Opportunities, risks, and criteria and indicators for sustainable practices. Biomass and Bioenergy, Volume 33, Issue 10, Pages 1321-1342.
  • Miller RE, Scott W, Hazard JW. 1996. Soil compaction and conifer growth after tractor yarding at three coastal Washington locations. Can. J. For. Res. 26:225–236.
  • Minnesota Forest Resources Council (MFRC). 2007. Biomass harvesting guidelines for forestlands, brushlands and open lands. Minnesota Forest Resources Council, St. Paul, MN. 42p. Available at: http://www.frc.state.mn.us/documents/council/site-level/MFRC_forest_BHG_2001-12-01.pdf.
  • Swift MG, Heal OW, Anderson JM. 1979. Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystem. University of California Press, Berkeley & Los Angeles, CA.

Connect with us

  • Twitter
  • Facebook


This is where you can find research-based information from America's land-grant universities enabled by eXtension.org



There are many factors that help determine the use woody biomass for energy production.  Below we consider the decision-making points involved in the process.  

How are We Doing?


Take A Short Survey Here and Help Us Out




This work is supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, New Technologies for Ag Extension project.